Like, attention, plus the suppression off thoughts away from intimate alternatives

Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Development and Person Conclusion, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The spot out-of attachment inside individual mating. Overview of Standard Mindset, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A good. (2002). Internet contradiction revisited. Diary out-of Social Activities, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, Yards., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Web sites contradiction: A personal technology that minimizes social wedding and you can mental better-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.Yards., & Industries, J. Yards. (2001). Amount, timing, and you may lifetime of marriages and you can divorces. Most recent People Records, 70-80, (Arizona, DC: You.S. Census Agency, 2005).

Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional investigation of closeness, passions, and you will union: Analysis the newest assumptions of your own triangular concept from love. Mental Accounts, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.step 3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Jordansk kvindelig Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impact most readily useful from the creating worse: Public contrasting within this personal relationship. Log regarding Personality and you will Societal Mindset, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, M. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh new implicit knowledge from personal competition. Log of Identification and you can Social Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

A great. (2001)mitment and you may dating restoration mechanisms

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automated inattention in order to attractive solutions: The fresh new changed mindset regarding relationships repairs. Advancement and Human Choices, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. E. (1981). Sequential data off conflict and you can accord inside distressed and you will nondistressed relationship lovers. Log regarding Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. A., Environmentally friendly, A. S., Gleason, M. J. (2002). Relationship creation on the internet: What is the larger attraction? Record from Societal Facts, 58(1), 9–30.

The great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization and also the design of fulfillment from inside the romantic relationship

Neff, L. An excellent., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-analysis purposes from inside the close relationship: A style of worldwide enhancement and you will specific confirmation. Into the P. Noller & J. Good. Feeney (Eds.), Information ents about study of pair telecommunications (pp. 32–58). Ny, NY: Cambridge College or university Drive.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the client-counselor bond from the contact lens out-of accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Principle, Search, Habit, Education, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). This new public overseeing system: Enhanced susceptibility so you can public cues once the an adaptive reaction to societal different. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The fresh new public outcast: Ostracism, personal difference, getting rejected, and you will intimidation (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Psychology Drive.

Penetrate, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). Worldwide and you can certain relational habits regarding experience of public connections. Journal from Character and Public Mindset, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A great., Tran, S., ). Attachment and you may suggestions looking to in personal relationship. Identification and you can Public Psychology Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and specific connection representations during the adulthood: Will there be a relationship?. Journal Of Public And personal Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. From inside the J. Harvey & An excellent. Wenzel (Eds.), Intimate personal matchmaking: Fix and you will improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, An effective. D. (2000). Projection personally impact certainly spouses since the a purpose of the similarity within common feel. Character And Social Therapy Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Meters. P. (1980). Negative effects of salience away from extrinsic advantages towards liking and you may enjoying. Record regarding Identity and you can Public Therapy, 38(3), 453–460.